A B C And D Classification Table For Proximal Humerus Fractures Download Scientific Diagram
Susan Harding, MD, Clin Associate Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery, Drexel University, Director of Orthopaedic Trauma, Hahnemann University HospitalFrom th The Neer classification of proximal humeral fractures is probably the most frequently used system along with the AO classification of proximal humeral fractures The terminology and factors which influence the classification are essential for the utility of radiological reports of proximal humeral fractures
Ao trauma proximal humerus fracture
Ao trauma proximal humerus fracture- Proximal Humerus Fracture AO Classification Müller M, In Manual of internal fixation, , 19 A Extraarticular unifocal fracture A1 Extraarticular unifocal tuberosity fracture 1 Gr Tuberosity, not displaced 2 Gr Tuberosity, displaced 3 associated with GH dislocation Extraarticular unifocal impacted metaphyseal fracture Introduction Proximal humerus fractures are seen most commonly in the elderly population, following a low energy fall 1, 2For the most part, proximal humerus fractures can be treated conservatively with the anticipation that the fracture will heal and the patient will regain function in that shoulder
Proximal Humerus Fractures Trauma Orthobullets
Revised January 06 Gregory J Della Rocca, MD, PhD;Involvement of the articular surface The AO/ASIF classification system for proximal humerus fractures broadly groups fractures based on the degree of articular involvement and likelihood of vascular injury Observer reliability and reproducibility for both the Neer and the AO/ASIF classification is fair to poor;AO Trauma P Varga, D Mischler, M Windolf Background The high failure rate of osteoporotic proximal humerus fracture fixations and the expected increase of their incidence indicate the need for improved fixation strategies and careful planning Validated computer models have high potential to complement or partially replace conventional biomechanical testing, expedite implant
The reporting and interpretation of data from clinical trials of proximal humeral fractures are hampered by the use of two partly incommensurable fracture classification systems the Neer classification and the AO/OTA classification It remains difficult to interpret and generalize results, to conduct prognostic studies, and to obtain consensus on treatment recommendationsImal humeral fractures, while the AO type C fractures occur in only 6% We suggest that the literature does not adequately re' ect the spectrum of proximal humeral fractures n Proximal humeral fractures are relatively common, as they represent about 4% of all fractures seen in the average orthopaedic clinic (Horak and Nilsson 1975) Nevertheless, little is known about theirIl est constitué d'une diaphyse (partie longue) et de 2 épiphyses (les 2 bouts aux extrémités de la diaphyse) Une fracture de l'humérus peut survenir
Ao trauma proximal humerus fractureのギャラリー
各画像をクリックすると、ダウンロードまたは拡大表示できます
A B C And D Classification Table For Proximal Humerus Fractures Download Scientific Diagram |  A B C And D Classification Table For Proximal Humerus Fractures Download Scientific Diagram |  A B C And D Classification Table For Proximal Humerus Fractures Download Scientific Diagram |
 A B C And D Classification Table For Proximal Humerus Fractures Download Scientific Diagram |  A B C And D Classification Table For Proximal Humerus Fractures Download Scientific Diagram |  A B C And D Classification Table For Proximal Humerus Fractures Download Scientific Diagram |
 A B C And D Classification Table For Proximal Humerus Fractures Download Scientific Diagram |  A B C And D Classification Table For Proximal Humerus Fractures Download Scientific Diagram |  A B C And D Classification Table For Proximal Humerus Fractures Download Scientific Diagram |
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿